Late nite pundits (or is it "talking heads"): laughable or laudable? [Part 1]

First off, I want to know who was arguing for Obama's "anti-surge" policy on CNN w/ Gleen Beek. I don't always like Beck, but on this one, he's got a point. Whoever this guy was, he simply threw up the following: we'll see in the future if a decision in the past was good. But one can say this about anything. MLK JR., Adolf whatchamacallhim, for it's impossible to "know" how an action will affect the future, that is, w/ exact precision. Well, it's not impossible per se, for there may be such a being that can do it, usually signified by the letters "G" "O" "D", at least in english. Such a being isn't human, and this man on "TV." Stop playing the game of "we'll see in the future" Mr. "talking head". That game just doesn't work anymore; it's folly, and we all know it. Mr. Obama will have to give an account of what he has, is, and will do: that I can guarantee, but to argue that his policy on the "surge" is still up in the air is, well, silly. Beck called you out on it w/ his chuckle; you just didn't know it, and the same goes for all of you "OBAMAMANICS" who can't think two days ahead because 'deity' Obama or, as a friend told me, "Pharoah Obama" is simply doin' his thing; And his "thing" just gots to be right.

There are other late night talk show hosts that are beginning to irritate me, and this will be made public. . . . Hey, O'Reilly, a poll about distrusting the media includes you too, pal!

LGM###